<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celestron Ultima 100mm Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spottingscopereview.net/celestron-52252-ultima-zoom/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spottingscopereview.net/celestron-52252-ultima-zoom</link>
	<description>User ratings and reviews of all the best spotting scopes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:15:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.spottingscopereview.net/celestron-52252-ultima-zoom#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spottingscopereview.net/?p=203#comment-120</guid>
		<description>We currently have a Kowa TSN-883 Prominar and Celestron C5. The C5 was great 14 years ago, advances in optics have left it behind (thus the Kowa). However, my wife and I both use scopes, and with the C5 being my hand-me-down, I have been seeking a replacement. After checking a number of spotting scopes in hand plus checking reviews, I prefer the Celestron Regal 52303 over the one in this review so have order one of those. I have high expectations ... time will tell the reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We currently have a Kowa TSN-883 Prominar and Celestron C5. The C5 was great 14 years ago, advances in optics have left it behind (thus the Kowa). However, my wife and I both use scopes, and with the C5 being my hand-me-down, I have been seeking a replacement. After checking a number of spotting scopes in hand plus checking reviews, I prefer the Celestron Regal 52303 over the one in this review so have order one of those. I have high expectations &#8230; time will tell the reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 41/46 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 439/444 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.spottingscopereview.net @ 2012-02-04 00:26:05 -->
